Wednesday, June 5, 2013

“Work! Save!! Win!!!”: Selling the Cost of World War I in America - Part 1: Introduction and Posters


Woodrow Wilson was less than a month into his second administration as President of the United States when he asked Congress to declare war on Germany. It was an unlikely position for the President, who had, in his inaugural address, just reaffirmed the nation’s neutrality in Europe’s war.[1] His famous reelection campaign slogan, “He Kept Us Out of War,” was suddenly replaced by an appeal to make the world “safe for democracy.”[2]
            At the time, The United States had very little in the way of a standing army, which was reflected in their annual budget. On the day that Congress passed the declaration of war on Germany, the entire national budget was $1 billon. Just a year later, war spending would force it to increase by 2000% to $20 billion.[3]
Figure 1 - Poster promoting Liberty Bonds.
All images in this post courtesy
of Library of Congress. 

Raising revenues by such an extreme amount proved a daunting task for the Treasury Department, but Secretary George McAdoo, along with the newly minted Department of Public Information, popular magazines and newspapers, and home front armies of volunteers from organizations like the Boy Scouts, The Four-Minute Men, and local bond drive organizers effectively sold bonds over the course of America’s 18-month involvement “over there” through posters, editorials, articles, lectures, social events, and door-to-door sales. These efforts, as we will see, played on a wide range of emotions and beliefs of Americans, ranging from pride in community and nation, to guilt and obligation, to depictions of belligerent enemies as monsters, non-Europeans, and amoral.  
            Regardless of their angle, these varied and often decentralized approaches at fundraising were all directed at The Department of Treasury’s “Liberty Loans”, of which heavy-loaded requests for purchase were made of the American people four times from April 24, 1917 to September 28, 1918.
Read about posters after the jump!


Posters
            Probably the broadest appeal to citizens to buy Liberty Bonds and War Savings Stamps of the Liberty Loans came in the form of posters. Hung in public buildings and private businesses, posters encouraging bond purchases were “confronting us everywhere.”[4] Early in the war, most government-issued posters aimed to encourage patriotic duty. One such example depicted the newly-born Uncle Sam holding a sign reading “You buy a Liberty Bond to-day I’ll do the rest” (Fig. 1), and explaining that those who purchase bonds wear a button to show their support.
This tandem of bonds and buttons was an effective tactic in pressuring the public. As the war went on, wearing a button as advertised on posters signified participation in the war, whereas those without buttons were shunned. “The millionaire who wears a Button has done something to take off the curse of his riches,” read one article.

The poor man who wears a Button has entered the ranks of nobility. By the Button the society woman shows that she is no longer merely an idler and spender but has risen to the plane of a Servant of Humanity. By the Button the shop-girl gives evidence that in some way she too is doing her bit in the great struggle of America to save the world.” In this way, the initially rather benign message of doing your part and wearing your button became a public shaming mechanism. Those not sporting the button were called “Crooked Sticks,” and all they’re “good for is to lie about in the backyard for better people to stumble over.” [5]

This reference to “lying about” most likely was an allusion to the hated “slackers” – those not doing their part in the war. Slackers were attacked and detained by the American Protective League (APL), a private volunteer organization who tasked itself with investigating loyalty among their neighbors and that had the support of the Attorney General’s office, in major cities all over the United States throughout the war period,[6] As virtually none of those detained in raids had legally done anything wrong, there was a reasonable fear among those not wearing buttons that they could face similar violence or detention.
Other early posters, on a theme that also was visible throughout the war, encouraged with variants of “doing your bit” (Fig. 2). This popular sentiment was accessible to the families of young Americans serving overseas, if a bit of a false comparison to servicemen in the trenches.
Figure 2 - Liberty Loan - Do YOUR Part to
End the War!
This particular marketing angle didn’t go without its criticism. Some of the strongest came from author Julian Street, who condemned the constant comparison of bond buying to overseas service. “At present we are being asked as a nation to absorb three billion dollars’ worth of Liberty Bonds,” he wrote, “bearing interest at a rate of 4 ¼ per cent. And, as I have said, there is in some of the appeals a sort of implication that, by so doing, we may render a service approximating that being rendered by our fighting men.” Street attacked the comparison: “While the man in the trenches stands ready to give his life, what are we asked to give? Nothing. While the man in the trenches gambles his life, what are we asked to gamble? Nothing – not even our sleek, comfortable dollars.”[7] Public response to this campaign apparently didn’t hold Street’s opinion – doing one’s “bit” was a prominent theme through all four Liberty Loan campaigns.
Figure 3 - "Help Stop This - Buy W.S.S. &
Keep Him Out of America"
While the earliest posters promoting Liberty Loans were patriotic in nature, they generally did not overtly attack Germans as a people or shame Americans too much. The appeal made by the poster designers at the Committee of Public Information began to change its tone by the Second Liberty Loan, and by 1918’s Third Liberty Loan, the savage depiction of Germans became commonplace in the posters. Negative depictions of the enemy were encouraged by private companies, such as the 1917 L. E. Waterman Company poster encouraging the purchase of War Savings Stamps (Fig. 3). The German soldier’s hulking, slightly hunched figure’s shadowed, Asiatic profile looks toward city ruins, gun and bloody knife in hand, as he carelessly tramples an impossibly small woman.
Official government posters and propaganda initially avoided depictions of Germans in this way, though they were rarely publicly denounced, if at all. Indeed, they were a visual embodiment of one of President Wilson’s great fears in entering the war – that by joining a fight where so many of America’s citizenry claimed ancestry among fighting nations, that tension, and even violence, might erupt among ethnic groups.[8] His worries became all the more real on April 4, 1918, when a mob in Collinsville, IL lynched a loyal German-American named Robert Prager. After putting the noose around Prager’s neck, the crowd hanged him from a tree, lifting and dropping his body three times, one for each color of the flag. His last request was reportedly to have his body buried wrapped in the American flag.[9]
Figure 4 - "The Hun is still watching! Show him we're in Earnest
Finish The Job
Victory Liberty Loan"
Despite this and other acts of violence against German-Americans, The government eventually embraced the German-as-monster imagery. Starting with dark eyes (Fig. 4) and bloody boots (Fig. 5), American propaganda declared that the “Hun is watching,” and suggested their capability of atrocities.
The American public was primed for this kind of representation of the Germans, as can be seen in a poem meant for children by Porter Emerson Browne just after war had been declared: “This is a Girl… Be-cause the Girl’s na-tion is un-pre-pared, the girl’s Fath-er and Broth-ers are killed. The Girl is worse than killed. That is all.”[10]
Figure 5 - "Keep these off the U.S.A. -
Buy more LIBERTY BONDS"
Poems like this one, partnered with images of blood-soaked Germans, reminded Americans of the alleged atrocities by the Germans in Belgium in the “Bryce Report,” an unsubstantiated but widely circulated and believed report of German atrocities against Belgian civilians released by the British Committee on Alleged German Outrages in 1915.[11] The symbolism of the savagery in that report, which alleged that Germans raped and murdered their way through defenseless, neutral Belgium, wasn’t lost on American propagandists, who made use of German attacks on women and children in their posters with great frequency (Fig. 6, 7).
With the more savage, direct appeals to aid America against a monstrous enemy, these posters must have been at least partially effective. While earlier campaigns were criticized in the press,[12] the loans increased in size and scope with each new incarnation. The Third Liberty Loan, in April, 1918, had more individual subscribers than the previous two.[13] Certainly, some of the later loan’s success must be attributed to the change in sales tactics by the government.
Figure 6 - "Remember Belgium"
Posters were certainly effective in raising awareness and encouraging bond sales, but in doing so, they played possibly the biggest part in depicting a large immigrant group in America as a dangerous “other.” The demand on German-Americans to prove themselves as American as a result of this campaign led to violence, as we’ve seen, and public demands for displays of loyalty not required of Anglo-Americans or other ethnic groups. “The American,” wrote a writer identifying with the 100% American “Vigilantes” writing group, “believes that the power in control of Germany [means] to control the world and that the German people… are obedient to that power, and to a large extent, sympathetic to it.” German-Americans who hadn’t yet publicly denounced their home country were just as much part of that group as those still in Germany, and the onus to be part of the America most of them had already pledged themselves to was put on them every day the war, the consequences their own responsibility. ”If the German-American says, “No! I will declare nothing!’ he has satisfied his pride or vanity, but not alleviated the situation; for the American (always ready to declare his own loyalty and welcoming the opportunity) cannot understand a pride or vanity which prevents a man from ‘declaring for the flag,’ especially if any creature on earth question his loyalty.” [14]

Figure 7 - "Halt the Hun"




[1] Woodrow Wilson, “Second Inaugural Address.”
[2] Woodrow Wilson,  Address to a Joint Session of Congress Requesting a Declaration of War Against Germany.
[3] Mark Sullivan. “When America Woke.” Collier’s Magazine. April 6, 1918, 6.
[4] Julian Street. “Our Fighting Posters,” McClure’s Magazine. July, 1918, 34.
[5] Dr. Frank Crane. “Button, Button, Who’s Got the Button?” McClure’s Magazine. September, 1918, 18.
[6] Christopher Capozzola. What Uncle Sam Really Wants, 44. David Kennedy. Over Here, 81-3.
[7] Julian Street. “Stand Back of Them,” Collier’s Magazine. April 20, 1918, 5.
[8] Susan A. Brewer. Why America Fights, 49.
[9] Christopher Capozzola, Uncle Sam Wants You, 185;
[10] Porter Emerson Browne. “A Primer for Pacifists,” McClure’s Magazine. May, 1917, 16.
[11] Susan A. Brewer. Why America Fights, 51-2.
[12] Julian Street, “Our Fighting Posters,” 34.
[13] ---, “What a Bond Is,” Collier’s Magazine, May 25, 1918.
[14] Booth Tarkington. “The Separating Hyphen,” McClure’s Magazine. October, 1917, 52.

No comments:

Post a Comment