Historian James McPherson (Princeton University) didn’t set
out to be a Civil War expert. Presenting his talk “Why the Civil War Still
Matters” at the Boston Public Library as part of the Lowell Lectures series,
Prof. McPherson explained that upon entering graduate school at Johns Hopkins
in the late 1950s, he had an interest in studying southern history, which as a Midwesterner,
he found “exotic and mysterious.”
It was the Civil Rights movement of his era that brought him
to study the Civil War and Reconstruction. In the midst of forced school
desegregation, McPherson wanted to learn more about how the 13th-15th
amendments that were called on came to be, and how they hadn’t been properly
implemented for almost 100 years.
With this introduction, McPherson spoke for just over a half
hour about the legacy and significance of the Civil War in the modern world.
Citing the conflict as the most popular history subject among Americans due to
its closeness to them, its drama and death toll, and its larger-than-life
characters, he touched on a greater, more subtle significance: The Civil War
was a fight over two different kinds of liberties.
Read more after the jump
Read more after the jump
Invoking
the concept of “positive vs. negative liberty,”
McPherson quoted Lincoln: “The world has never had a good definition of
liberty,” the late president said, “and the American people, just now, are much
in want of one. We all declare for liberty; but in using the same word we do
not all mean the same thing.” The historian then explained that the South
believed they had fought the American Revolution to self-govern, and that their
liberty was to not be prohibited from doing what they wanted to do by others.
This, he explained, was a negative liberty. This was in line with the American
heritage embodied in the Bill of Rights, which declared people free from government control. The North, on
the other hand, advocated for positive liberty – the right to things. Specifically, the right of slaves to have access to
education and rights, which would allow them to reach their potential, and the
right of businesses to compete in a market where everyone pays their people
fairly, and so don’t have unfair advantages. This concept of liberty is best
embodied in post-Civil War amendments to the US Constitution, particularly the
13th-15th.
McPherson
used this example to highlight disputes in the modern era. Pointing to libertarian-minded
small government activists like the TEA Party and much of the modern RepublicanParty as examples of negative liberty advocates, he pointed to liberalism and
the Democrats, who advocate equality in education and funding for social
programs as harbingers of positive liberty. Despite the connotations of the
terms, the professor did not directly suggest that one kind of liberty was
better than the other, but rather that they were not the same, and likely incompatible.
“This,” he stated, “is why the Civil War still matters.”
There
were a handful of positions and theories thrown out to the audience throughout
the talk. McPherson pointed out that, no matter how hot things had gotten since
the Civil War, nobody had seriously attempted to succeed from the Union since
the war’s end. He took this opportunity to take a rather humorous dig at Rick
Perry’s suggestion to lead Texas in succession, closely followed by his
presidential candidacy to lead the nation he proposed to succeed from. In another
well-received moment, he said “white, as well as black southerners are probably
better off now having lost [the Civil War] than they would have been had they
won it.” Clearly speculating, he was standing on solid ground given modern
economic realities. He added with a laugh, “some of them might even admit it!”
Professor
McPherson delivered a clear, concise, and interesting talk on the modern
implications and significance of the Civil War, to a room packed with
listeners. In doing so, he maintained the tradition of the Lowell Lecture
Series, and did a service to all those in attendance.
(image above: Prof. McPherson signing books after lecture)
No comments:
Post a Comment